Would 3d not work better by using 2 cameras shooting the same piece of film?I mean if the first camera was positioned in such away as to record the background (hidden but closer to the background & moveable) and the second on the subject (closer up) would this not in effect achieve the illusion of 3d? and without having to wear the glasses.I still think the true answer lays in multiple cameras (shooting upwards, downwards and sideways, as well as at the front) and tv's that project an outer screen (a bit like lasers in a night club ) which project a 4 wall dimension around you, at the moment you can jump out of your skin watching 3d and something appears to be coming at you, what if the other 4 angles were considered.Proving this is way beyond any technology I could afford to mess around with, I only just manage to keep my version of windows 98 working with software :(
How about a 3D test parody?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjeNQf_uyJ4
This comment has been removed by the author.
Really trustworthy blog. sesli Please keep updating with great posts like this one. sesli sohbet I have booked marked your site and am about to email itto a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading.. sesli chat
Thank you for sharing a nice article.seslisohbet
Thanks for the information. I really enjoyed, I would like get moreinformation about this,because is very beautiful, thanks for sharingFue Saç Ekimi Diş Doktoru Freelance Web Tasarımcı
In the post has been shared the 3D seeks so that can be know that and used in this video so nice creative video.wooden flooring